How GCP Resource-Based CUDs Help You Save Money

Image shows Piyush kalra with a lime green background

Piyush Kalra

Jun 9, 2025

    Table of contents will appear here.
    Table of contents will appear here.
    Table of contents will appear here.

Cloud costs are an escalating concern for companies across the globe. A survey indicates that 80% of companies cannot forecast cloud costs, typically overshooting budgets by 20 - 30% each billing cycle. The volatility is driven by erratic consumption, intricate pricing structures, and suboptimal cost-monitoring practices.

GCP counters this by offering resource-based Committed Use Discounts, a sophisticated mechanism for turning erratic charges into predictable line-item forecasts. By pledging to a defined quantity of resources for a term of one to three years, organizations lock in lower unit costs and convert fixed, predictable consumption into flexible operational models.

This guide unpacks the mechanics of GCP resource-based CUDs, identifies the user profiles that capture the highest fiscal benefit, and outlines step-by-step deployment methods that yield the maximum return on cloud investment.

What Are Resource-Based Committed Use Discounts?

GCP resource-based CUDs constitute a binding arrangement in which an organization secures Compute Engine capacity for a fixed duration in return for reduced pricing on the specified resources. Unlike standard on-demand payment, resource-based CUDs can reduce the effective rate by as much as 70% on designated capacity in return for an enforceable assurance of minimum utilization over the term of the commitment.

Resource-based committed use discounts function within discrete geographic domains, targeting particular machine families across defined regions. Upon acquisition of a commitment, the customer commits to a guaranteed minimum level of resource use, quantified in vCPUs, memory, GPUs, or Local SSD storage, across a term of either 12 or 36 months.

Key Benefits:

  • Scope: Applies to specific resource types (vCPUs, memory, GPUs) confined to specified machine families, as opposed to the wider applicability of flexible CUDs.

  • Geography: Valid only within a single GCP region; applications spanning multiple regions require individual regional commitments.

Specificity: Directs attention to particular hardware configurations, facilitating tighter cost management through accurate modeling of expected workloads.

How CUDs Compare to Other Types of GCP Discounts

Choosing an appropriate discount model is critical for driving cost efficiency and aligning with organizational objectives. The comparative profile of CUDs relative to alternative pricing structures is summarized below.

Pay-as-You-Go Pricing

The Pay-as-You-Go model provides maximum deployment flexibility, as it entails no upfront contractual obligation. However, this flexibility is accompanied by elevated unit costs, resulting in full retail pricing for all consumed resources. The absence of price predictability can complicate budgetary control and impair the accuracy of financial forecasting exercises.

Sustained Use Discounts

SUDs deliver automatic, tiered price reductions of as much as 30%, contingent on the resource remaining provisioned for a defined percentage of the monthly billing cycle. The absence of a binding contract is advantageous, yet the magnitude of savings is limited when benchmarked against full CUD pricing, which can exceed 70%, thereby constraining the discount’s utility as the principal cost management lever.

Spend-Based CUDs vs. Resource-Based CUDs

CUDs come in two forms: spend-based and resource-based, each catering to different company needs.

Spend-Based CUDs: These allow you to fix a monetary commitment that can be distributed across numerous services. The model provides the following advantages:

  • Useful across heterogeneous workloads, from transient compute to long-running storage.

  • Centralized commitment simplifies the oversight of multi-service portfolios.

  • Dynamic workload profiles benefit from the ability to reallocate spend without renegotiation.

Resource-Based CUDs: These require a commitment to discrete quantities of particular resources, yielding steeper discounts but confining flexibility. Their principal advantages are:

  • Discount levels that can reach 70% compared to on-demand pricing.

  • Certainty in the reservation of explicit quantities, which mitigates over-provisioning.

  • Streamlined capacity planning for predictable, steady-state applications, allowing more accurate forecasting of infrastructure needs.

Benefits of Using Resource-Based CUDs

(Image Souce: GCP Cloud)

Resource-based CUDs yield quantifiable benefits for companies whose workload profiles are both stable and foreseeable.

Cost Predictability

Fixed-pricing under CUDs removes the variability associated with cyclical cloud pricing. Companies incur uniform monthly costs that remain constant irrespective of public pricing turbulence, thus facilitating precise budget formulations and long-term capital allocation. Such cost certainty is particularly valuable for enterprises orchestrating complex, multi-fiscal-year technology roadmaps.

Higher Percentage Discounts

CUDs deliver deeper percentage discounts than competing pricing strategies:

  • 1-year commitments: 20% discounts depending on resource type.

  • 3-year commitments: 37-70% discounts for maximum savings.

  • Memory-optimized instances: Up to 70% savings for specialized workloads.

Optimized for Stable Workloads

Resource-based commitments are designed for workload profiles that are both steady and prolonged, encompassing production databases, web-serving stacks, and periodic batch-processing pipelines. The binding of resources to these workloads guarantees capacity and performance, translating into sizeable cost reductions.

Compute Engine Discount Optimization

CUDs are automatically enacted for all Compute Engine instances residing within the designated committed regions and machine families. Eligibility extends to custom machine types, to preemptible workloads, and to sole-tenant configurations, ensuring broad discount uptake across heterogeneous infrastructure deployments.

Who Should Use Resource-Based CUDs?

Resource-Based CUDs are best suited for environments where cloud consumption patterns are both stable and foreseeable. When a company is willing to pledge a defined capacity over a multi-year horizon, significant savings relative to on-demand tariffs emerge. Typical scenarios for adopting Resource-Based CUDs include:

  • Web applications with steady traffic: Services that exhibit steady levels of user interaction impose uniform resource demands that fit well under a fixed commitment.

  • Long-term data processing or ML projects: Workloads such as periodic data transforms or continuous model training programs that operate for long durations can lock in pricing that offsets the costs of long-running compute.

  • SaaS companies with non-seasonal usage: Services that deliver consistent transactional load year-round can match committed resources to ongoing demand without the risk of underutilization during off-peak months.

  • Enterprises standardizing their cloud footprint: Large companies that distribute stable workloads consistently across their cloud footprint realize significant savings by standardizing resource reservations.

How to Set Up and Purchase GCP Resource-Based CUDs

Activating resource-based CUDs entails methodical assessment and precise configuration.

Locating and Purchasing CUDs in Google Cloud Console

  1. Go to GCP Console > Compute Engine > Commitments.

  2. Select Create Commitment.

  3. Choose your region, required resources (CPU, RAM, GPUs), and duration (1 or 3 years).

  4. Review pricing and available discounts.

  5. Click Purchase to complete the process.

Purchase Guidelines

  1. Choose Your Commitment Plan: Choose a one-year term for a 20-57% discount while retaining the flexibility to adapt to changing needs, or a three-year term for a 37-70% discount, well-suited for steady, predictable expansion.

  2. Review Historical Usage: Review 3-6 months of usage logs to identify steady, predictable consumption patterns.

  3. Determine Commitment Size: Translate the baseline usage into specific resource units to prevent over-allocation.

  4. Choose the Machine Family: Pick appropriate instance families (N1, N2, C2, etc.) that align with the required performance metrics of the workload.

  5. Configure Geographic Spread: Submit distinct commitment orders for each region that mandates resource provisioning.

  6. Review Terms and Conditions: Read and understand the clauses that govern commitment, especially any limits on cancellations or modifications.

Monitoring Usage and Optimization

Conduct ongoing analysis to sustain effective CUD deployment:

  • Usage Reports: Analyze commitment usage percentages delivered each month.

  • Cost Analysis: Measure current cost against initial savings estimates to validate effectiveness.

  • Capacity Planning: Adapt upcoming commitments based on shifting consumption patterns and forecasts.

  • Resource Rightsizing: An instance specification to guarantee complete resource engagement and to elevate CUD efficiency.

Best Practices for Cloud Cost Optimization

Cloud cost optimization demands a disciplined framework that capitalizes on CUDs while curbing unnecessary expenditures. The following best practices provide a solid foundation for efficient resource allocation and long-term savings.

1. Combine CUDs with Rightsizing and Custom Machine Types

The leverage of CUDs is amplified when it is accompanied by granular resource rightsizing. Custom machine types permit the tailoring of vCPU and memory footprints, allowing the commitment timeline to synchronize perfectly with workload demands. This strategy effectively curtails the costs associated with over-provisioning.

For example, suppose your application that consistently requires precisely 6 vCPUs and 14 GB of memory can be provisioned with a custom instance that meets this footprint. The alternative, choosing a predefined machine type with 8 vCPUs and 16 GB of memory, results in unnecessary cost for unused capacity.

2. Monitor and Optimize Underutilized CUDs

Regularly analyzing your commitment utilization is crucial to ensure you're getting the best ROI. Here are some strategies:

  • Maintain Utilization Thresholds: Maintain utilization above 80% across all commitments, guarding against needless waste.

  • Reallocate Resources: Find idle CUDs and transfer them to projects with urgent capacity needs, flattening peaks and reducing hot-spare sprawl.

  • Split Large Commitments: Break sizable 3-year CUDs into smaller, 1-year or 6-month slices, enabling surgical adjustments as workloads drift.

  • Configure Auto-Renewal: Set auto-renewal activation with 12-month capacity forecasts to preempt excessive carry while still honoring signal-driven growth.

Monthly Savings with GCP CUDs: A Strategic Analysis

This analysis highlights the significant cost savings achieved through the strategic implementation of GCP CUDs.

Before Implementation

Infrastructure Profile:

  • 100 n2-standard-8 instances across us-central1 region

  • Average monthly runtime: 720 hours (continuous operation)

  • On-demand pricing: $0.389 per hour per instance

  • Monthly cost: $28,008

  • Annual cost: $336,096

After CUD Implementation

Commitment Structure:

  • 3-year resource-based commitment

  • 800 vCPUs, 3200GB memory allocation

  • Commitment discount: 57%

  • Monthly commitment cost: $12,043

  • Annual commitment cost: $144,516

Detailed Cost Breakdown

Metric

Before CUDs

After CUDs

Savings

Monthly Cost

$28,008

$12,043

$15,965

Annual Cost

$336,096

$144,516

$191,580

Percentage Saved

-

-

57%

3-Year Total Savings

-

-

$574,740

Usage Reports and Analysis

Monthly utilization reports show a sustained 95% commitment utilization rate, confirming that resource sizing is finely tuned and that cost efficiencies have been maximized. The net savings have been reinvested into expanded development capacity and ongoing modernization of core infrastructure.

Conclusion

Resource-based CUDs enable companies to reduce cloud costs by 40% to 70% while ensuring budgetary predictability. Recommended best practices include employing the GCP Pricing Calculator to conduct cost comparisons, consulting sales representatives for insights on enterprise-scale commitments, and initially procuring CUD capacity equal to 60% to 70% of observed baseline consumption. This disciplined approach allows for substantial savings while preserving both operational flexibility and performance benchmarks.

Join Pump for Free

If you are an early-stage startup that wants to save on cloud costs, use this opportunity. If you are a start-up business owner who wants to cut down the cost of using the cloud, then this is your chance. Pump helps you save up to 60% in cloud costs, and the best thing about it is that it is absolutely free!

Pump provides personalized solutions that allow you to effectively manage and optimize your Azure, GCP and AWS spending. Take complete control over your cloud expenses and ensure that you get the most from what you have invested. Who would pay more when we can save better?

Are you ready to take control of your cloud expenses?

Similar Blog Posts

1390 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94102

Made with

in San Francisco, CA

© All rights reserved. Pump Billing, Inc.